Schedulers are UI-first, API-maybe
Most social tools bolt on a partner API with narrow scopes and separate limits. Automation is a second-class citizen.
For developers
Content is an API surface now.
Inklate is API-first in the literal sense: the dashboard is a client of the same guarded API you get. If you'd rather script your content pipeline — or let an agent hold it — nothing stands between you and the surface.
The usual story
Sound familiar?
Agent integrations mean glue code
Wiring an LLM to a scheduler usually means a custom tool layer you now maintain forever.
Multi-tenant claims, single-tenant schemas
'Organizations' implemented as a column filter make security reviews awkward.
How Inklate answers
The plays that change it
MCP server, zero glue
Point Claude, Cursor, Codex, or Windsurf at one URL with an org API key. Tools, schemas, and auth are already done.
OAuth 2.1 / OIDC provider
Build integrations users authorize per organization — Inklate issues and validates the tokens.
Row-level security for real
Tenant isolation is enforced by PostgreSQL RLS, not by middleware discipline. Say that in your security review.
Questions
Developers, answered
Is the MCP server a wrapper?
No — it's built into the API service itself and calls the same guarded handlers as the dashboard. One surface, three doors: UI, REST, MCP.
What about rate limits and quotas?
Plan entitlements (like monthly post quotas) are enforced server-side per organization
Also built for
Give your agents a content platform
Create an organization, connect a channel, and let your team and your agents publish together.